BY NOT PROVIDING PEACEKEEPING TROOPS TO UKRAINE, ALL COUNTRIES HAVE FAILED.
Meetings between the US and Russia are a pointless exercise.
Protecting a country’s sovereignty is the duty of all countries in the world. Of course, this can only be done with peacekeeping troops.
Delivering weapons is therefore not a favor but only half work. Countries that only supply weapons to Ukraine have in fact abandoned the people of Ukraine.
Mentioning the billions that the arms deliveries have cost is an insult, an insult to the hundreds of thousands of war victims among the Ukrainians who have made the real sacrifices.
The country with the largest and strongest army in the world, the US, has therefore also failed the most.
Certainly, in that capacity, it has nothing to demand from other countries in the world, and certainly not from Ukraine. The US must humbly look at itself and still work on the unity of all countries in the world to defend Ukraine against Russia.
Of course, this must be done through the United Nations, which must be thoroughly reformed at the same time.
How it really should be done.
First of all, all countries are obliged to be members of the UN and therefore obliged to ensure the sovereignty of each country.
The members are delegated by their country but do not represent the interests of that country but the interests of all countries. Each country is obliged to provide troops and weapons in proportion. The supreme command rotates.
The Security Council rotates. The right of veto is abolished. Decisions on the deployment of troops and the use of force are taken by a two-thirds majority.
While the armed forces are transferred to the UN, NATO must be dismantled. Participation of all countries in both the decision-making and the implementation of the UN must prevent, for example, the superpowers from dividing the world among themselves.
Group formation, such as NATO, to defend one’s own group, must be rejected to prevent a chain reaction and countries outside the group feeling threatened or using threats as a pretext to use violence themselves, as Russia has done and is doing.
This also applies to the group formation of 2 superpowers, such as the US and Russia, or of another combination, or of 3 superpowers.
The US has already shown through its unilateral contacts with Russia that it considers this group formation to be more important than that with NATO.
The meetings of the UN General Assembly have shown that good decisions can be taken with almost unanimous votes regarding Gaza, Lebanon, Palestine, Israel. It is the veto of the US that prevents the implementation of such an almost general decision.
Of course, it will not be so easy on other issues, such as Ukraine, but for that, the participation of all countries, including Russia, China, India, Japan, Iran, African and South American countries, etc., all of which are obliged to participate in the decision-making and troop supply of the UN, and the dissolution of NATO, must be an incentive to reach a two-thirds majority.
The current meetings between the US and Russia are a pointless exercise, because in the event of any decisions, the UN and its organizations, such as the International Court of Justice and the International Criminal Court, will be in their path.
Photo: Trump: <Zelensky talked the US into a war that could not be won and should never have been started and that would cost us 350 billion dollars.>
(The reality is that the American arms manufacturers have made a lot of money from it and that it has boosted the economy nicely)
Donald Trump accused Kyiv of starting the war despite the fact Russia invades Ukanian territory in 2022. (And annexed Crimea in 2014!)
Zelensky says Ukraïne’s goal is to create secure peace together with U.S. and European partners.
